With & Without Vivid Color Function

[softbunny]

I love to take waterlilies and lotus flowers but it wasn't the right time to catch the lotus flower open as I was there at one of the hottest part of the afternoon....2.30pm...damn hot!!!

1. With my G9 Vivid Color function ON
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3159/2361686837_16a61bf4c2_o.jpg



2. Without the Vivid Color on
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2068/2362517774_ee1218563f_o.jpg


Which color is better ah??

[Alan_drg]

For landscape & flower shooting better with vivid on as color will pump out but on human portraits is not good as skin tone will look warm & reddish

I learn the hard way... :(

[noordin]

Vivid colour is the way to go for flowers. Definitely. :-)

[na7ure]

Vivid all the way for Macro :) :D

[klguy]

Yep - vivid is nicer but you may want to tone down the saturation just a wee bit.

For shooting in harsh sunlight, you can always ask a friend to hold up one of those black semi-transparent mesh-like car shades over the flower : this will help to diffuse the bright sunlight.

I'm sure many of the young eligible male photogs here will volunteer to be your coolie cum general helper...:D:D:D

[noruazumi]

the vivid is nice. :)

[qqmeng]

vivid has the added punch!! like tongkat ali!! :D

[ShaolinTiger]

Vivid one looks really nice to me.

[desaintlights]

Vivid one looks really nice to me.

I agree with ST.

The vivid one is nicer.

[orionmystery]

Vivid is nice!

[nfariz8]

definitely vivid! :D