Iso 3200 - Portrait

[Swift3230]

Dear sifu's, mind to let me know if this photo the noise is ok for the setting ISO 3200 ??? thanks

by the way.....intro tis my fren, Vivian.;)

[xfreedom]

hmmm.....:boohoo:

[mki88]

It is quite noisy but still acceptable for me. However the WB is way out for my liking. Her eyes turn yellow. Btw the lighting condition must be very dim to shoot at ISO3200 and f1.8.

[zeinchang]

hmn..a bit noisy

[raclette]

looks good enough for me. how about a 100% crop:D

[tools4fools]

Noise is clearly visible in background however the overall image is sharp. Quite good shot in my opinion. A bit of editing (white balance among the things to work on) could improve the pic.
Plus a smile from the otherwise pretty lady.... ;)
*****

Hope you don't mind, was doing a little editing:

1) Vivian endited
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x270/egoipse/Vivian01.jpg

Quite a different image...

In capture NX:
- white balance changed
- Skin tones edited, eyes lightened, sharpened
- Background tones edited, saturation of blouse upped
- eye shadow lightened and make up around eye reduced (left some to have a more real look)
- retained shiny parts on nose to keep 3D look
- slight blur faded in on skin
- noise reduction on background
- lips slightly darker and saturation up

In Photoshop:
- clone stamp/healing tool used on skin marks
- overall sharpening
*****

[bcteh]

For 3200 ...can't complaint... it is good already.

[tools4fools]

One more, changed the color of the blouse:

2) Vivian in red
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x270/egoipse/Vivian02.jpg

****

[noordin]

Why would anyone want to do portrait at ISO3200? The WB is all off and makes the model look sickly! :D

[tools4fools]

Because in some places use of speed light is not allowed?
Because someone want to try out ISO 3200?
Because someone doesn't like speed light pics?
*****

[noruazumi]

ISO3200, looks good... :)
just the WB was off. :)

[karheng]

ISO 3200 best shot in B&W...heheh

[desaintlights]

It is quite noisy but still acceptable for me. However the WB is way out for my liking. Her eyes turn yellow. Btw the lighting condition must be very dim to shoot at ISO3200 and f1.8.

I totally agree.... +100000

[Swift3230]

hmmm.....:boohoo:
u hm.......wat?

It is quite noisy but still acceptable for me. However the WB is way out for my liking. Her eyes turn yellow. Btw the lighting condition must be very dim to shoot at ISO3200 and f1.8.

lol, the area full of tungsten light, her eye too yellow(actually is red)cause of drink too much beer/achohol

hmn..a bit noisy

hm...don have 1.4:run_away:

looks good enough for me. how about a 100% crop:D

din try yet 100% crop, hehe.....maybe i try later

Noise is clearly visible in background however the overall image is sharp. Quite good shot in my opinion. A bit of editing (white balance among the things to work on) could improve the pic.
Plus a smile from the otherwise pretty lady.... ;)
*****

Hope you don't mind, was doing a little editing:

1) Vivian endited
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x270/egoipse/Vivian01.jpg

Quite a different image...

In capture NX:
- white balance changed
- Skin tones edited, eyes lightened, sharpened
- Background tones edited, saturation of blouse upped
- eye shadow lightened and make up around eye reduced (left some to have a more real look)
- retained shiny parts on nose to keep 3D look
- slight blur faded in on skin
- noise reduction on background
- lips slightly darker and saturation up

In Photoshop:
- clone stamp/healing tool used on skin marks
- overall sharpening
*****

capture NX? whats that ya ? thanks for advise & ur cool editing too....love it, hehe

For 3200 ...can't complaint... it is good already.

thanks bro

One more, changed the color of the blouse:

2) Vivian in red
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x270/egoipse/Vivian02.jpg

****

haha.......change the girl too:cool:

Why would anyone want to do portrait at ISO3200? The WB is all off and makes the model look sickly! :D

just for testing ya noordin:D wanna explore out the iso3200 on the 40D

Because in some places use of speed light is not allowed?
Because someone want to try out ISO 3200?
Because someone doesn't like speed light pics?
*****

noted all:D:cool:

I totally agree.... +100000

i don have iso100000 leeeeeeee

ISO 3200 best shot in B&W...heheh

hm...would try next time, thx for advise

ISO3200, looks good... :)
just the WB was off. :)

cool, wat i can do at here to tune back the WB, capture NX?

[tools4fools]

Capture NX is Nikon RAW editing software. Guess Canon would have something similar....

If you shoot RAW you can adjust WB setting later on in software. Or do it manually by using white/grey/black point and adjusting RGB sliders.

So that was taken after a night out? Thought she looks a little tired...
******

[gr2k]

the dynamic range is totally off..but noise+sharpness is controlled pretty well IMHO..

updgrade to D300 la..ISO 3200 still looks wonderful! :P

edit: oops i just realised you're on Canon system..hehe

[albert8112]

her skin tone is way off due to incorrect WB.

[EdwinTan]

if u view it from other point of view.. such as old picture feel.. like back in those flim day..after printing out and long the color will be out..

this pic is nice, i like the effect...

[Swift3230]

if u view it from other point of view.. such as old picture feel.. like back in those flim day..after printing out and long the color will be out..

this pic is nice, i like the effect...

thanks EdwinTan :) :adore:

[mitmivec]

At ISO3200 any camera with AWB will be yellowish lo ... that's the actual scene mah :D

[ShaolinTiger]

Noise is decent enough, but it's small so can't really say. Subject is fairly well exposed so not much noise there.

Colour is way off as mentioned, can be corrected and makes quite a nice pic.

24310

Would be better from RAW :)

[jmaguireokm]

for me at ISO3200 can have that kind of results consider not bad already la
you not going to develop a poster size or A3 size photos, a 4R photos cant really see the noise :D

[Swift3230]

Noise is decent enough, but it's small so can't really say. Subject is fairly well exposed so not much noise there.

Colour is way off as mentioned, can be corrected and makes quite a nice pic.

24310

Would be better from RAW :)

IS direct from RAW actually...just sharpen only

for me at ISO3200 can have that kind of results consider not bad already la
you not going to develop a poster size or A3 size photos, a 4R photos cant really see the noise :D

thanks dude, maybe is time to upgrade the camera body as well to get better less noise :)

[ShaolinTiger]

IS direct from RAW actually...just sharpen only


The whole point of shooting RAW is so you can correct WB and exposure..

[csjian]

IS direct from RAW actually...just sharpen only



thanks dude, maybe is time to upgrade the camera body as well to get better less noise :)

ya..time to come to dark site..D300 :P

[rahmat]

erm ... not bad:cool:

www.flickr.com/bobrahmat