Shutter Asia Forum  

Home Forum Shoutbox Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Shutter Asia Forum > Gear & Technique > Nikon Equipment
Register Facebook Flickr Rules

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2011, 10:20 AM
calvincychin's Avatar
calvincychin calvincychin is offline
Shutter Guardian
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,062
Thanks: 39
Thanked 106 Times in 94 Posts
Country:
Travel Lens?

Hi buddies,

I would like to get yours opinion on what lenses you will be bring to adventure photography trip such as Tibet, Nepal, Silk Road etc...

I still can't make up my mind yet so hope fellows can give your views...

Combination in consideration (full-frame):-
1. Nikkor 24-70mm
2. Zeiss 25mm + Zeiss 85mm
3. Zeiss 25mm + Zeiss 100mm
4. Nikkor 20mm + Nikkor 24-70mm
5. Nikkor 24mm + Nikkor 105mm
6. Nikkor 28-300mm
7. Nikkor 20mm + Nikkor 28-300mm
8. Zeiss 25mm + Nikkor 28-300mm
9. Zeiss 21mm + Nikkor 28-300mm
10. Nikkor 20mm + Nikkor 50mm + Nikkor 105mm
11. Nikkor 16-35mm + Nikkor 70-200mm

(obviously weight is the main consideration; I know you u say I am comfusing myself... what to do??? I might be going there once in a lifetime)

... any other great combination you are using?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2011, 11:09 AM
dinduboy14 dinduboy14 is offline
Shuttertastic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 640
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Country:
i'd say from my experience wide lens are the best for traveling (i.e. 14mm)
and get a prime f/1.4 for portrait/low light photography.

Enjoy ya travels!!...i'm jealous already
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dinduboy14 For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #3  
Old 01-19-2011, 07:20 PM
ridzuan's Avatar
ridzuan ridzuan is offline
Shutterfreak
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 26
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
Country:
i had the same ordeal, when i only brought the 20mm and cursing not bringing the heavier 24-70. Looking at your list of arsenal, i would prefer 21, 50 & 105. I know that the 21 is heavier than the 20.. but as you said, its once in a lifetime. Also bring your cargo pants for the 2 lenses not attached to the body its just my personal preference
__________________
expose for the mid tones, allow for the shadows, filter the highlights
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ridzuan For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #4  
Old 01-19-2011, 09:08 PM
morkers1777's Avatar
morkers1777 morkers1777 is offline
Shutter Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 54
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Country:
bring the nifty 50 cause its nifty. lightweight and fast.

10. ( Nikkor 20mm + Nikkor 50mm ) - Nikkor 105mm
__________________
Gear - D700 | FE2 | Nikkor 20mm f/1.4D | Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D | Nikkor 85mm f1.8 | SB 800
http://www.azriemuzaffar.com/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to morkers1777 For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #5  
Old 01-19-2011, 10:57 PM
tools4fools tools4fools is offline
Shutterfreak
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangna Bangkok
Posts: 1,023
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Country:
16-35 f4, 50mm AF-S 1.4 and 105 macro

15-36 is good wide which is important for travel/secenery plus good street walker going up to 35mm

50 is low light chea and small

105 gives you some tele and portrait and macro for little stuff

otherwise 24-70 and 105 macro

would NOT get the 20mm, it does not do well on FF corners are not sharp, when cropping gives you max 22mm, not worth the dosh, better get the 24-70 or 16-35 combo
=====
Get a belt with two pouches, one small one medium, so you can carry all tree lenses without bag...
looks a bit cowboy but works great.
=====

Last edited by tools4fools; 01-19-2011 at 10:59 PM..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tools4fools For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #6  
Old 01-20-2011, 02:37 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy astroboy is offline
Shuttertastic
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Citizen of Asia
Posts: 899
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Country:
Take it from someone who shoots travel images for magazines.
U just need 2 lenses:
17-40 (landscapes, architectural, interiors)
24-70 (walk-around, portraits, quick snaps)

I use Canon. I guess the 17-40 equivalent for nikonians wld be 16-35? It's nice and sharp and great for landscapes.

U don't want to be changing prime lenses when out in the field, esp in dusty, crowded, locations.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to astroboy For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #7  
Old 01-20-2011, 11:56 AM
calvincychin's Avatar
calvincychin calvincychin is offline
Shutter Guardian
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,062
Thanks: 39
Thanked 106 Times in 94 Posts
Country:
Thanks buddies,

I share the same opinion as you guys here... I like prime for IQ and f stop. I like zoom for flexibility but it is a bit big and heavy. For ultimate IQ, I like Zeiss but this will slow me down in my trip as it is manual focus. Sometimes it is a problem when we have a limited time in a site or the moment is just happen in a few second.

I agree with Astro that most of the time I will be using 24-70 and up to 150... the wide side is normally taking scenic and group photos, which normally I have more time for it but not the walk around... normally I will need 24-150 (most of the time will be 24-70; but some time need up to 150 also).

For macro shot, I just zoom to the max and take a shot (my work around if I don't have macro lens with me). Then crop it and up size... normally it is still good on 8R.

I wish the following work... steal from dcview.com. hope they don't mind.

Screen shot 2011-01-20 at 11.41.00 AM.jpg


What if I have two bodies? prime only? zoom only? prima and zoom? MF or AF?

Last edited by calvincychin; 01-20-2011 at 11:59 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-20-2011, 09:02 PM
scorgio scorgio is offline
Shutter Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Country:
16-35 + 24-120.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scorgio For This Useful Post:
calvincychin (01-21-2011)
  #9  
Old 01-21-2011, 12:21 AM
Cottonteil Cottonteil is offline
Shuttertastic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 735
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
Country:
In that list of lenses, I'd take the Nikkor 16-35, 28-300 and the 24.

Remember to tape up the lens mount area with that white plumbers tape.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-21-2011, 12:34 AM
calvincychin's Avatar
calvincychin calvincychin is offline
Shutter Guardian
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,062
Thanks: 39
Thanked 106 Times in 94 Posts
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cottonteil View Post
In that list of lenses, I'd take the Nikkor 16-35, 28-300 and the 24.

Remember to tape up the lens mount area with that white plumbers tape.
Thanks,

hope you don't mind...

why we need to tape up the lens mount area with that white plumbers tape. you don't afraid blocking the light into the sensor or the flipping mirror?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
good and affordable travel lens for 400D? kayjay Canon Equipment 22 04-25-2009 09:01 PM
Sigma 18-200 Lens Canon Mount - Good for travel rush Want to SELL 2 05-27-2008 10:29 AM
Travel Companions apophoto Chit-Chat & Off-Topic 6 05-08-2008 04:56 PM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Site Content and Design Copyright 2007-2013 Shutter Asia - All Rights Reserved
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design